Відео

They both sound very close. It's more about the features and core(s) in the Apollo. Scarlett doesn't have it's own built in computing power. Once your session gets huge it'll start to lag and crackle from all the plugins bogging down your CPU. Being that Apollo has it's own CPU(s) built in, you're least likely to experience lag... Unless you're in a 128 track recording session or somethin' crazy like that. Even with that, grouping plugins and side chaining can fix that.

cool😊

Thanks

Great video. I got a behringer 202hd and a t.bone rb500 to start learning about recording saxophone, voice and guitar. The audio input is very low, even with the gain to the top. What am I missing in this set up?

What a shame we have to have the irritating subliminal "muzak" in the background! I find it difficult to ignore it and concentrate on what the gentlemen are saying. Seems to be the norm nowadays!

I see how the noice cancelation works, great explanation.

It would have been nice to have seen an overhead view of that Ampex machine working, so that we could see how the tape threading works. During that audio demonstration starting around 8:30, would have been good.

Hi, Thanks for the video. Would you use this console into a recording studio as part of the mixing toools? What do you think?

Dude!!! Thank you for the knowledge!!

Here's a good Part 3 for you: You left out one advancements in recording sound. In the late-30's, the movie industry recorded sound optically on movie film stock, even after magnetic recording tape had been perfected. In addition to recording optically, it also incorporated multi-track recording. There were usually 3-track. Stereo really wasn't in the picture at the time, but they had the opportunity to mix those 3 tracks down to a single optical trackburned into the master negative film reels. To put it into perspective, and maybe you are too young for it, but before video tape and digital disc formats, films were played with projectors. These films often included an optical soundtrack. In addition to the high-intensity lamp to project the film onto a screen, there was another lamp which shined through the film sound strip and there was a photo-electric cell on the other side of the film. This principle was also employed by the Philco "Beam Of Light" record player, which played conventional records. OK. When you look at the sound strip on a film, it looks just like a record groove. So, because of optical film recording, today, we have true stereo mixes of old classic movies like "The Wizard Of Oz". Movie studios continued with their 3-track recording after magnetic film was invented. This is why that we have stereo mixes of movie soundtracks when the recording industry was still using one or two-track magnetic tape recorders. Take Elvis Presley movies, which function as a platform to introduce new Elvis songs. This were recorded 3-track at the same time that Elvis was recording for records on one or two-track. Elvis' 1956 hit song from the movie was "Love Me Tender", which was recorded in 3-track. There has been a stereo mix out there for years. Then there is also "Jailhouse Rock" which has also been available in a stereo mix for awhile. Remember, these recordings were made in 1956 and 1957. Stereo was strictly in the development phase for records, but stereo had been introduced on the oversized cassettes for RCA's special tape players. The music available was often classical. Now, as far as multi-track tape recorders, people like Les Paul had been using multiple tape recorders all mixed down to one track to get his signature sound. This was a real pain because the same stuff had to be recorded over and over again. Les Paul got the idea to add more recording and playback heads to a tape recorder. He contacted Ampex and they built an 8-track tape recorder for him. Atlantic Records had been interested in making stereo recordings since soon after the label's creation. In the early-50's, Atlantic Records started to put out "Binaural" records. These required special double tone arms, as the stereo groove was still experimental. Atlantic Records also had Ampex build them an 8-track recorder. It took the rest of the industry awhile to catch up. Going through phases, first 2-track, then 3-track, then 4-track, on and on. And remember, the movie industry was doing multi-track 3-track recording decades before. Oh, another modification of the recording process. In the early-60's, after magnetic movie film had been around for awhile, record labels and recording studios figured they'd try recording on magnetic film stock instead of magnetic recording tape. It presented it's own problems besides being more costly than magnetic tape.

This guy doesn't know shit about the history of wire recording and what it was used for...

Can a guitar amplifier be connected to either of the outputs on the Volt 1 and Volt 2?

Yes but digital also has 3-7ms latency per channel....so depending on the internal routing you can get over 200ms latency very easily....as well as compression decay it can add up to a very muddy mix

The big disadvantage is digital hiss, latency, and system hang-up during operation... does analogue do this???

Nowadays digital mixers have helped almost 90% of the work.😅

Thank you cor this brilliant, easy to understand explanation of balanced circuits.

Have watched this and the next video you've made. They are excellent.

GIK Acoustics are awesome im also very happy

There's some misinformation here about RCA jacks, stereo, and surround sound. Digitial Coax out uses a single RCA for 5.1 surround sound. That's a single RCA cable for all six speakers (to a surround decoder - same as the optical, or toslink). Furthermore, many computer systems and audio receivers use RCA out for surround speakers: one pair for the front, a pair for the rear, and a pair for the center and subwoofer (LFE). Additional pairs may also be present for however many speakers are desired - one cable per channel, or speaker.

HAHA. Musician cups microphone. Me: On goes the gate.

So polarity is when you are going against the zeitgeist, but phase is when you are simply ahead of your time?

Simultaneously discovered....... sure. Except it wasn't "discovered". It was INVENTED. The German machines weren't "discovered" by Americans. They were stolen. The designs were copied and eventually altered.

It's that voice for me ❤😂thank you for the clear review ❤

7:31 I need a separate video for this because as a soft-spoken person in a loud city, it's really hard to find mics that work for me.

Thats the exact question I was looking for :) I never understood where were the specifications which determines what was a nearfield or farfield centric speaker. I know a Genelec 8020 wouldnt be suitable for farfield as a KEF LS60 for example, but never understood where to look on a spec sheet Great video!

Ok first mixer than amplifiers.....what about stabilizer and ups?

I must say, That "Sound Check 2" audio test CD has me dropping my jaw floorward when the "20Hz Sine Wave" was audibly audible on these Austrian Audio Hi-X15 Headphones are wider than any 'others'., though not as intense as some on here have pointed at. There is a tad bit upper vocal overage in this area.

Sound craft vi the sq6 and 5 and the x32 compact is all I have the pleasure of using so far and an old Midas amplifier desk 48 channel that was sweet 🤣🙏🏾🔥

coool video . i use krk rokit7 G4 ...and sonarworks . i found we have samilar Room EQ respond graph . under 100hz below big dip .....is that SBIR cancle the low end below 100? but big bump at100-200 . i use 11 bass trap from wall and side wall even celling , seem dosent work . if Sonarwork boost the low end below 100hz like 50-90 to make it flat .... but SBIR (room mode ) still cancle that boost ....so im litlle confussed about that .. but resualt is that i heard more bass and kick drum after sonarworks ,, and graph become flat. but i still cant trust is that really flat enough for mixing . thanks for advice

Fascinating, the cheaper the medium, the less the music is worth.

Americans and Russians have stolen technology from us (Germany). But only the Amercians did really develop them. The Russians tryed a lot of things, but they only used the benefits from this technology for their space program. With success, as we all know. The other things, meeeh...

great explanation! gives me great input for my phd work. Thank you for your support!

I like using the Allen & Heath SQ5 or SQ6, Qu16 is solid too though 👍

i have recently jumped into the x32 rack system at my church, i am a visual learner this is the best video for me yet. thanks

Nice video. Question . Adam Audio A7V .what is that crazy dip at 1k . 10db , no way 😮

192.000 views :D

Another great step by step tutorial with diagrams and useful tips. Perhaps more beginners guide in the future as more older generations take up recording at home. A step-by-step guide for analogue hybrid system of mixing and match to connecting for both technologies. From connecting & mixing up drums and other instruments on to a DAW via analogue connections.

Seeing RME TotalMix in the background made me say giggidty. I will never use another audio interface brand ever.

Adverts etc.etc. are a REAL intrusion to this video ☹

my dream one would be an Avid S6L, but currently M32/X32

How is the Arturia Minifuse

My favourite is the x32 I'm normally much more savvy than all the people I ever work with on shows but it's a really good mixer that is overlooked today despite it being so useless friendly and good sounding. The soundcraft si impact is a fun desk to use but it's tricky because of the layers.

Superb explanation!

I used to run sound for a small church in the 1980's. Of course, back then all the equipment was analog. Everything you said brought back such memories! I have been watching a lot of audio tutorials lately as a way of refreshing my memories, and perhaps learning something I didn't know. I'm probably older than your father, but I have determined to never stop learning! I enjoy the straightforward, common-sense way you present your lessons. It makes me want to get back into mixing live sound!

Question, if you record a full band this way with the sub 1-2 would you have to have just one track for everything or is there a way to record individual tracks to be able to mix and master later? Sorry if this doesn’t make sense beginner here

We have an Allen & Heath Qu16 at work. Not my favorite (I'd rather go for the SQ or the dLive) but I love the brand. Their consoles are so easy to understand and work great at a low price point compared to companies like Yamaha.

This was more helpful than my study guides. Thanks 😊

For personal use the Soundcraft UI24R. The best sounding sound crew uses a Midas console. Love the sound of it but it could be the Midas touch.

0:54 Harvey Korman? 😉

I like using the Yamaha QL and CL series. Great console